Public Option NOW

The insurance industry has decided to turn on the health care reform bill, and attacks at the best possible moment for Democrats. Rather than continuing to work on this bill that protects insurance companies, the foolish corporations have elected to mount an offensive on the bill. They will regret this decision, because it means the beginning of the end of private insurance.

With cover provided by private companies who want to raise rates on consumers, the Dems will have every reason to pursue a robust and universal public option. If private insurance companies want to raise rates by thousands of dollars, then the best solution for consumers is an option that eliminates them from the process.

The left is gearing up for a fight in 2010 - and answering the insurance companies with strong congressional action is a great way to earn the trust of voters, and bring real reform to America's health care systems.

SCOTUS - pants on fire

The Supreme Court failed to address the unconstitutional ruling of Florida's judiciary, and let stand a law that violates the basic rights of students in that state. The decision not to hear this case is a direct attack on current precedent. In 1943, the SCOTUS ruled on a similar case, and concluded that students enjoy the same right of conscience as any other citizen, and cannot be compelled to salute or to pledge allegiance to the flag.

This hits very close to home for me, as I was one of the few students in my school who objected to the pledge, and refused to legitimate the indoctrination it represents. If I had been subject to discipline of the nature practiced in Florida, I expect I would have brought a suit as well. Coercing students into reciting the pledge serves no legitimate purpose, and requiring parental excuses does nothing to remedy the assault on the first amendment.

This is a travesty, but at the same time, I am of mixed mind - would the SCOTUS have overturned their previous ruling? That could have been an even worse disaster. Still, I encourage students in Florida (and everywhere) to ignore such laws and follow their conscience and the constitution. The precedent from 1943 still stands, and the right to freedom of expression trumps any judicial pronouncement in these cases.

Boehner's Blog

http://republicanleader.house.gov/blog/?p=632

I am an American voter who supports the public option as part of comprehensive health care reform. There are 200 million Americans like me who want Congress to act in our best interest and include a government plan to keep insurance companies honest.

You currently have access to public health care as a member of Congress, care that I pay for when I remit my taxes each year. I want to have access to a similar program, where pre-existing conditions, ability to pay, and restrictions on participating facilities are not an issue.

Thousands of my fellow Americans die each month for lack of health insurance. Our nation currently spends twice as much as similar nations who have implemented public health care - and all of these nations also have better health outcomes than we do.

The Republican plan to date has been nothing short of insanity. Please, if you want to do something for America, support the public option. Or at least stop lying about the massive grassroots support that it enjoys. If you claim not to have met a supporter of public health care, you might want to look in the mirror. You already enjoy it - why should the rest of us have to do without?

Re: Strangers to Dissent, Liberals Try to Stifle It

"You're either with us or against us in the fight against terror." - George W Bush

The author's agenda is showing. Liberals are not strangers to dissent - we invented and perfected it. That's the problem. There is a time and a place for dissent, and there is a right and a wrong way to dissent.

The current dissent represents spectacularly the 'wrong way', and Obama is just speaking truth to stupid.

Original article by By Michael Barone

Perverse to compare truthers to birthers

I hate to say it, but the ongoing attempts (Van Jones the latest) to discredit persons who support fully investigating what occured before during and after the events of 9/11/2001, are rather strange. The comparisons to so-called "birthers" that are becoming de rigeur are actually demeaning to the truthers. It raises the larger question:

Why would one NOT want to understand the reasons for such a massive failure of our government?

Health Care Limbo

So this summer the dance craze is the "Health Care Limbo" - let's see how low we can set the bar for health reform. Obama has been on the record as supportive of a public option for all, rather than the current "senior-centric" system. Given the upcoming bump in boomers drawing on public programs, this is the right time to make big changes. But as the summer has dragged on there has been a lot of debate about the various possible means to accomplish the basic goals of health reform.

For the record:

The Administration believes that comprehensive health reform should:

Reduce long-term growth of health care costs for businesses and government
Protect families from bankruptcy or debt because of health care costs
Guarantee choice of doctors and health plans
Invest in prevention and wellness
Improve patient safety and quality of care
Assure affordable, quality health coverage for all Americans
Maintain coverage when you change or lose your job
End barriers to coverage for people with pre-existing medical conditions

---

I happen to agree with Obama on these points, and I can see how there are many potential paths to achieving these goals.

What is perplexing is that the GOP has any traction fighting against these basic principles. The issue has been approached blindly and the media has been a big part of exacerbating the problem. Most businesses would gladly give up the expense and chore of dealing with health care, and the simplest and most effective way to do this would be a single payer system. The evidence in the world at large is rather overwhelming.

Single payer has achieved the goals outlined by the President. Supplemented by additional or optional private coverage, it is the best of both worlds for all of us.

Absent a "public option" it becomes much more difficult to achieve these goals. Private companies need an incentive to improve their products, and the public plan would provide a backstop for the millions of unemployed and working people who are without coverage. Private insurance companies have perverse incentives that lead to the denial of needed care, bankruptcy for the sick, and insecurity for all.

Until the final bill comes to a vote, I will refrain from a specific critique, but it seems to me that the government must not abandon a hand in achieving the goals set out above. The private market has proven to be more expensive, and less healthy.

Torture Photos: Obama's Pragmatism

The impending release of photos of US detainee torture, after the ACLU's successful lawsuit under the FOIA, have led Obama to indicate that the government will launch further appeals. This seemed to be a reversal of his expected response, and was very frustrating for those on the left who were pushing for transparency.

I have a slightly different perspective. I think Obama has made a very wise and calculated move in appealing the ruling. He has defused a great deal of criticism from those on the right by agreeing to proceed with an appeal, while at the same time the outcome will most likely remain unchanged in the end. Obama gets to have it both ways - he can act like the GOP wants him to now, and defuse their criticism, and after the appeals, the photos can be released anyway, mollifying the ACLU crowd.

This is a win-win for Obama, and a great example of how a brilliant politician can turn the tables when you least expect it. Pragmatism at its best.